[For any sort of clarification on the draft general reference to the primitive outline of the scheme as I wrote more than three months ago and his most recent and complete presentation. As
repeated, are about to read a trace theory, no claim to completeness. If find it too complex, skip.]
repeated, are about to read a trace theory, no claim to completeness. If find it too complex, skip.]
On the one hand, the distinction of the person authoring the club, to establish and capture a lone voice, independent of any outside influence. On the other dialogue with tradition, each time historically determined, acting on the work already completed in the individual artist, as long as his voice is not annihilated. These are the first two figures that we have identified the rational analysis of the artistic process.
However, at least for the analysis of causation of the art, it lacks a crucial step *.
[* The artistic process can be divided into two distinct phases, which are intertwined and mutually reinforcing: the causation of art - that is the cause of the birth of the artist and his work - and the purpose of art, but better not to anticipate anything, not mixed up the idea. ]
The artist can not remain isolated in itself. Like every human being from birth and live with others in a social network that you can not help but escape, as it can be narrow and paralyzing *.
[* There is therefore a biological reason for the social life of human beings, explained by evolutionary biology and anthropology; reason so strong in us it can not be reflected in the faculty of Art - the most distinctly human of all our faculties - that pushes the individual to (re) ask the club of his works.]
We have already said, with an obscure formula guilty , that "no isolated genius." This is true not only in composition, or, so to speak, theme - art (as art is renewed from its ashes, and is nurtured with his own life) but also and more simply at the social level.
In other words, the artist to be recognized as such needs to draw closer to the society from which at first it was posted. The I remains tied, so to speak, to its environment of origin, with whom he can never do without dialogue, perhaps in an unconscious way.
node that encompasses the artist and society is a node that constitutes the very concept of "art" *.
[* The artistic process, which arises from the individual, it would become sterile if unaware of another dialogue, the one with the company, which redefines the relationship of unity with other, the artist can try to reintegrate or refuse to do so: in any case its dialogue with the other choices.]
It makes so manifest another curious property of the artistic phenomenon, its not really be caused by a single artist authoring, but rather a "supra-party " formed by the individual (the motor), by viewers or users of the work (the recipients) and the time period employed in the recognition of art *.
[* What at first glance it seems an oddity, not really a formula that is dictated by common sense and everyday experience. We have so far spoken of " artistic phenomenon" precisely because, like all phenomena, it is temporary and requires an agent and an object. The artistic experience is not immortal, or eternal: depends on the viewer's enjoyment. Without it, the art does not exist. The artistic phenomenon may last less than two months, or even in the case of modern installation, only a few minutes. The variable "time" greatly influences the whole process, but it is not necessary that the two moments of creation and reception are contemporaries.]
Art is two-faced : born of pure individuality while at the same time depends a community. The dialogue with civil society can be accomplished in the art of it.
To understand the importance of a return to former club, or that group of people who are willing to talk with the artist's work, just think what would happen if the individual does not propose its work in the community.
The problem of the division between art and non-art, then, would not arise either, because there would be nothing to analyze: the work, outside of the public, does not exist. Are there any materials, works of art potential, but the quality would remain latent and unknown art alive.
Only when the public spoke on the work to life, triggering the process of recognition that the updates, one can speak of a conclusion of the artistic process.
Dall ' I posted in search of biographical individuality as well as social, you move to a I dialoguing with the Customs, in conflictual relationship with the past, and finally, the 'I tied will be forced to recognize the impossibility a final separation from the Other, as is the whole supra-authoring - Receiver to establish the work of art in progress.
However, at least for the analysis of causation of the art, it lacks a crucial step *.
[* The artistic process can be divided into two distinct phases, which are intertwined and mutually reinforcing: the causation of art - that is the cause of the birth of the artist and his work - and the purpose of art, but better not to anticipate anything, not mixed up the idea. ]
The artist can not remain isolated in itself. Like every human being from birth and live with others in a social network that you can not help but escape, as it can be narrow and paralyzing *.
[* There is therefore a biological reason for the social life of human beings, explained by evolutionary biology and anthropology; reason so strong in us it can not be reflected in the faculty of Art - the most distinctly human of all our faculties - that pushes the individual to (re) ask the club of his works.]
We have already said, with an obscure formula guilty , that "no isolated genius." This is true not only in composition, or, so to speak, theme - art (as art is renewed from its ashes, and is nurtured with his own life) but also and more simply at the social level.
In other words, the artist to be recognized as such needs to draw closer to the society from which at first it was posted. The I remains tied, so to speak, to its environment of origin, with whom he can never do without dialogue, perhaps in an unconscious way.
node that encompasses the artist and society is a node that constitutes the very concept of "art" *.
[* The artistic process, which arises from the individual, it would become sterile if unaware of another dialogue, the one with the company, which redefines the relationship of unity with other, the artist can try to reintegrate or refuse to do so: in any case its dialogue with the other choices.]
It makes so manifest another curious property of the artistic phenomenon, its not really be caused by a single artist authoring, but rather a "supra-party " formed by the individual (the motor), by viewers or users of the work (the recipients) and the time period employed in the recognition of art *.
[* What at first glance it seems an oddity, not really a formula that is dictated by common sense and everyday experience. We have so far spoken of " artistic phenomenon" precisely because, like all phenomena, it is temporary and requires an agent and an object. The artistic experience is not immortal, or eternal: depends on the viewer's enjoyment. Without it, the art does not exist. The artistic phenomenon may last less than two months, or even in the case of modern installation, only a few minutes. The variable "time" greatly influences the whole process, but it is not necessary that the two moments of creation and reception are contemporaries.]
Art is two-faced : born of pure individuality while at the same time depends a community. The dialogue with civil society can be accomplished in the art of it.
To understand the importance of a return to former club, or that group of people who are willing to talk with the artist's work, just think what would happen if the individual does not propose its work in the community.
The problem of the division between art and non-art, then, would not arise either, because there would be nothing to analyze: the work, outside of the public, does not exist. Are there any materials, works of art potential, but the quality would remain latent and unknown art alive.
Only when the public spoke on the work to life, triggering the process of recognition that the updates, one can speak of a conclusion of the artistic process.
Dall ' I posted in search of biographical individuality as well as social, you move to a I dialoguing with the Customs, in conflictual relationship with the past, and finally, the 'I tied will be forced to recognize the impossibility a final separation from the Other, as is the whole supra-authoring - Receiver to establish the work of art in progress.
0 comments:
Post a Comment