In my first speech on " artistic creation as cognitive process" have passed now some months.
In the meantime I tried to place the mine - somewhat confused - ideas. I wondered if the whole theoretical apparatus really had any sense, or whether it was, as often happens, only the result of my suggestion.
Is it really possible to be able to speak in a "general" (or, as it were, enlarged), a phenomenon inseparable from individuality, such as artistic creation? Also: You may be able to explain the art from the perspective of cognitive authoring of the subject?
This certainly discouraged me and distracted me from work. The challenge seemed insurmountable, and the fear of being publicly denied continued to grow every day. Too many holes, too many mistakes, too many inaccuracies. Arbitrary and personal ideas.
Not long ago, however, I came across by chance in a sentence of 'Atlas Philosophy of Holenstein (probably one of the most important works of philosophy in the last 10 years) where it says specifically that:
"Creativity is a phenomenon unclear. (...) For the biology requirement is crucial because new elements are born the geographical isolation of a population. In human cultures, however, develop creative originals are often the result of proximity and contact, trade and communication with other cultures . "
read this galvanized me and I started working on the project with new force of work and patience.
Holenstein admits that the creative phenomenon has not yet been properly explained, at least not from the perspective of the subject.
If, as I believe, is now proven that the cultural richness of an entire population is more dependent social relations it has with other cultures (historically, in fact, are precisely the periods of intense commercial and cultural exchange to create the conditions suited to an intense and unpredictable artistic flowering - see ages 5, 12-13, 17, 19), it is equally true that we have properly investigated the preconditions that ahead of artistic creation at the individual level .
Moreover, reading the most diverse and often disparate artists distant in time and space (especially in their most intimate writings, those not directly aimed at publication), I realized that the logical grid of speculation that I proposed to explain the phenomenon of artistic creation, in many cases could match up with the ideas and feelings expressed there.
this unexpected symmetry also gave me a new desire and curiosity to develop my thesis, correct and free from personalities, in a constant counterpoint between reading and formulating a rational scheme to better understand the phenomenon of artistic creation.
That "as cognitive process" should not be construed as wishful thinking or theoretical scientific pretense, far from it.
We know that the causes and contributing factors of artistic creation can not be caged in a single grid and infallible logic, nor can they be explained once and for all.
Something escape for all to every rationalization.
The mention of this cognitive process will emphasize the individual size of our research and our attention: the subject is not in this case the movement artistic supra, on the contrary, the single subject authoring.
I would point out also that everything you read should not be regarded as nothing more than an experiment, a draft or a draft work still in progress .
The theme is truly immense, and my forces are unequal compared to the size of study needed to properly investigate some of the dynamics are extremely complex, in addition, an extensive study of the topic would require a time longer than we can afford to simply as "amateurs."
One more thing: whenever I use the adjectives "my" or "our", I refer either to the joint work of Elia Tazzari and myself. His valuable comments and his work were vital to honing intellectual, and his indispensable support. It helped me to develop a most comprehensive and mature, adding its strength in cases of contradiction theory.
is indeed fortunate to have a mind so sharp and different from yours, a culture so vast and solid, and yet be able to discuss a free and exciting, at par. Thanks again.
0 comments:
Post a Comment